Websites Can Be Beautiful (1 of 3)
Of the several sessions I attended at South by Southwest 2010, three stood out to me as an interactive director – all dealing with the same topic, in a different way – making websites attractive. This is post one of three, covering the first session in detail.
Lead! When was the last time you saw a statue of a committee?
Claiming your website is easy to use is like a restaurant claiming that their food is edible.
The first session was led by Cennydd Bowles of Clearleft, Ltd and was called simply Beauty in Web Design. This session was the first session of the first day of SXSW and included these wonderful quotes above. Cennydd’s point was that there are no works of art in web design, no truly revolutionary sites and as designers (visual or UX) we can all do a bit better.
Bowles talked through a bit of the history and psychology of good design. For instance, humans are always judging beauty innately, it’s not a learned behavior (it’s something you can watch a baby do) and the three types of beauty:
- Universal – everyone sees it
- Sociological (example of model’s now vs Milo’s Venus), changes with society preferences
- Subjective – personal opinions – beauty in the eye of the beholder
This session really emphasized how good UX design isn’t just making the site usable and Cennydd’s point was we should be pushing limits and trying to do something new. I agree completely with this sentiment and as you’ll see during the next post, I talk about one of the reasons why website design is becoming too consistent due to content management systems.
